No filter fluency required
You describe who you need. The agent works out how to look for them, and tells you what it assumed so you can correct it.
Talent Summoner vs SeekOut
SeekOut indexes 1B+ profiles and gives recruiters 30+ filters to slice it, plus diversity and compliance tooling and integrations that resurface candidates already in your ATS. Its self-serve Recruit Core plan is published at $149 per month billed annually, with three seats and a 14-day trial. That depth pays off when someone searches every day. Talent Summoner is for everyone else: describe the role, get a ranked shortlist with reasoning.
Side by side
| What matters | Talent Summoner | SeekOut |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | From $39 per role, or a $79 monthly plan with 4 Roles included. Free to start. | Recruit Core published at $149 per month billed annually, or $179 monthly, for three seats; higher tiers are quoted. |
| Search input | A plain-English role brief — the agent asks follow-up questions. | Filters and structured queries across 30+ facets, with AI-assisted search on top. |
| Output | A ranked shortlist with written evidence for why each candidate matches. | A filtered candidate list you review and shortlist yourself. |
| Filtering depth | Fewer knobs — you correct the agent in plain English instead. | 30+ filters, with advanced power filters and diversity filters on higher tiers. |
| Your existing ATS | Not connected today. We search the open market only. | ATS integrations that resurface candidates already in your system. |
| Commitment | Pay per role. No subscription required. | 14-day free trial; the self-serve plan is billed annually, higher tiers are annual and quoted. |
SeekOut plan names, prices, and product claims as published on seekout.com, August 2026. SeekOut is a trademark of its owner; Talent Summoner is not affiliated with SeekOut.
Why teams switch
You describe who you need. The agent works out how to look for them, and tells you what it assumed so you can correct it.
Candidates arrive already scored against your must-haves, each with the reasoning attached — not a list still waiting to be screened.
Seat-based plans assume continuous sourcing. If you hire in bursts, you shouldn't be paying between them.
FAQ
We don't publish an index size, because we search live rather than serve a fixed database. The honest comparison is on the output: SeekOut hands you a filtered list, we hand you a ranked shortlist with reasoning.
No. SeekOut can resurface people who already applied to you; we search the open market. If mining your own history matters most, SeekOut does that and we don't.
If you have a dedicated sourcer who wants fine-grained control of every filter, or you need diversity and compliance reporting across a large team, SeekOut is built for that depth.
Yes — starting is free. You describe the role and see how the search works before paying for a role.
Read also
Recruiter-grade sourcing without an annual seat licence — pricing, workflow, and when each one fits.
→Licensed like a Hong Kong agency, priced like software — placement fees vs pay-per-role.
→A search box you drive yourself vs an agent that hands back a ranked shortlist.
→An enterprise recruiting stack vs focused sourcing you can start the same day.
→An all-in-one hiring system vs sourcing that needs nothing migrated.
→Describe the role in plain English and let the agent do the searching — free to start, then $39 for the role.