Plain-English briefs
Type what you need. There are no Boolean strings or filter trees to learn, and the agent asks follow-up questions when something is missing.
Sourcing
You write the brief the way you would explain it to a colleague. The agent asks follow-up questions, agrees the criteria with you, then searches public professional profiles and comes back with candidates ranked against what you asked for.
Each candidate arrives with a score, the evidence behind it, and the parts of their background that made them a match. You are reading a judgement, not a list of search results.
What it does
Type what you need. There are no Boolean strings or filter trees to learn, and the agent asks follow-up questions when something is missing.
Before searching, the agent writes up the ideal-candidate profile it plans to use. You edit it and approve it, so the search runs on your criteria rather than its guess.
It reads publicly available professional profiles, including LinkedIn and GitHub, instead of a fixed database of people who already applied.
Every candidate carries a score against your must-haves and nice-to-haves, plus a written explanation of why they matched.
Send a message mid-search to narrow it, widen it, or change direction. You do not have to wait for a run to finish.
Save candidates, add someone you already know, ask for contact details, and mark where each person has reached — contacted, replied, interviewed, offer, hired.
How it runs
FAQ
No. You do not need to bring a seat on any recruiting product to use sourcing.
Publicly available professional profiles and other public professional information.
Yes. You can add a candidate to the shortlist yourself and have them evaluated alongside the ones the agent finds.
Use ranking instead. It scores CVs you already hold against one job description.
Describe a role you are hiring for and see the shortlist it comes back with.