AI Recruitment Statistics: What 2,432 AI-Scored Profiles Show
You don't need 200 candidates. Across 52 real searches, our AI pulled in about 48 profiles per role and shortlisted about 12.

In our data, a typical role ends with a shortlist of about 12 people. The AI pulled in about 48 to find them.
We build Talent Summoner, which searches public profiles and ranks each one against your must-haves. Your first Role is free, with no card (pricing).
Key takeaways
- A median search shortlisted 11.5 profiles. Each one scored 65 or more and met every must-have.
- The AI ranked 63.6% of 2,432 profiles below 65, so they rank below your shortlist.
- 643 of 1,686 profiles missed a must-have (38.1%). The app puts them below the ones that pass.
- 43 of 52 searches gave a shortlist of 5 people or more.

If you need one named person from a small pool, read when this approach is wrong for you first.
AI recruitment statistics from 52 searches
A Role is one hiring search. Our AI gave each profile a score from 0 to 100 against that Role's brief.
| Measure | Result | Out of |
|---|---|---|
| Shortlist per Role, median: scored 65+ and met every must-have | 11.5 (middle half: 6 to 23.5) | 52 Roles |
| Roles with a shortlist of 5 or more | 43 of 52 | 52 Roles |
| Profiles pulled in per Role, median | 48.5 (middle half: about 25 to 80) | 52 Roles |
| Scored below 65, the Good fit line | 63.6% (1,547) | 2,432 scored profiles |
| Missed at least one must-have | 38.1% (643) | 1,686 profiles checked against a must-have |
Source: 52 Talent Summoner searches by real users. See how we counted.
What this means for your next hire
You start at the top of a ranked list, not at profile one. The AI does the first read and tells you why each person is there.
Say one profile takes you two minutes to read. In a typical Role you skip about 36 of 48 profiles, which gives you back more than an hour.
Your must-haves decide the cut, so write them with care. Our guides show how to write must-haves and why more profiles do not mean a better shortlist.
How the AI sorted the pool

Most of these profiles were scored before we added a location pre-screen. It now removes people outside the target location first, so today's share at 65 and above is likely higher.
A score is a prioritisation aid, not a verdict. It shows a match to your brief, not how well a person will do the job.
When this approach is wrong for you
- You need one named person from a pool of a few dozen. Fit bands tell you little about so few people.
- You want someone to talk to candidates and sell the role. That is an agency's work.
- You need candidates in an applicant tracking system today. We do not connect to one yet.
Where Talent Summoner fits
Talent Summoner searches LinkedIn, GitHub and other public sources, over 200 million profiles. It ranks each person against your must-haves and nice-to-haves and explains every score.
You send outreach from your own Gmail, Outlook or LinkedIn, and you review each message and confirm the send. Your first Role is free and your second is US$4, then US$29 per Role, or US$59 a month for 10 Roles.
Trade-offs, stated plainly: no paid InMail, no always-on pipeline and no ATS integration today.
Method
- Source: searches that users ran in Talent Summoner. Our AI gave every score, not a human reviewer.
- Counted: 2,432 scored profiles in 52 Roles. "Pulled in" counts every profile a Role found, including those without a score.
- Excluded: team, test and suspected automated sign-up accounts.
- Checks: without the largest account, no band share moved more than 1.3 points. The free Role shows up to 50 candidates, so some Roles hit that cap.
- Biggest limit: 96% of the profiles were scored before the location pre-screen, so today's fit shares are likely higher. We do not report how many profiles recruiters kept, because too few selections were recorded.
- Refresh: we run this query again every quarter and update the page.
FAQ
How many candidates should AI sourcing give me for one role?
Across 52 Talent Summoner Roles, the median Role returned 11.5 profiles rated 65+ that met every must-have. A median of 48.5 profiles were pulled in per Role to find them.
What percentage of AI-sourced candidates are a good fit?
Our AI rated 36.4% of 2,432 Talent Summoner profiles 65 or above, the app's Good fit line. A rating shows a match to the brief, not a hiring outcome.
How long does AI sourcing take to return a first scored profile?
Across 52 Talent Summoner Roles, the first scored profile arrived a median 7.4 minutes after the brief was created. That includes time the user spent confirming the criteria.
What is a good AI candidate match score?
There is no universal scale, because each tool scores differently. In Talent Summoner, 65 to 84 is Good fit and 85+ is Strong fit; 11.5% of 2,432 scored profiles reached 85.