
How Missing Evidence Should Affect Candidate Fit
A practical framework for classifying missing candidate evidence, judging materiality and choosing whether to progress, verify, hold or close.
Latest news and updates from our team


A practical framework for classifying missing candidate evidence, judging materiality and choosing whether to progress, verify, hold or close.

Learn how to turn hiring-team feedback into controlled sourcing changes while keeping evidence, weighting and human approval visible.

A practical guide to hiring developers in Singapore, from role scope and budget to sourcing, technical evidence, offers and work authorisation.

Direct employment, remote teams, employer of record, contractors and agencies — what each model costs you in admin, control and risk.

A practical founding engineer hiring plan covering role scope, sourcing, evidence, work samples, references, offers and mutual diligence.

A practical GitHub sourcing guide for engineering roles: inspect project context, authorship, collaboration, recency, licences and privacy limits.

Too many CVs for one role? Rank them with a free tool, then screen the best ones yourself. Five steps from a pile of CVs to a shortlist, with a worked example.

Learn how evidence differs for technical and product hiring while keeping candidate ranking criteria, unknowns and human decisions consistent.

A copyable founder checklist for reviewing candidate rankings, checking evidence, controlling changes and assigning the next action.

Compare candidate matching software by job-related evidence, uncertainty, explainability and review controls, not a misleading fit score.

Learn what a candidate fit score means, what it cannot prove, and how to inspect criteria, evidence, unknowns and ties before deciding.